Ernest Hilbert Introduces a Special Issue for Louis MacNeice

October 30th, 2007

L MacNeiceAs editor of the Contemporary Poetry Review, I have assembled a special issue devoted to one of my favorite British poets, Louis MacNeice:

Just as Ben Jonson bore the unfortunate fate of living in what would become known as the “Age of Shakespeare,” Louis MacNeice lives in the long shadow thrown by his exact contemporary, W.H. Auden, who dominated his generation of poets and gave a name to the “Age of Anxiety” (Auden’s book of that title begat a symphony by Leonard Bernstein, secured a Pulitzer Prize for the recently naturalized poet, and was hailed by the New York Public Library as one of the most influential books of the last century). Together they suffered the temporary indignity of being joined as ingredients of “MacSpaunday,” the belittling coinage devised by critic Roy Campbell in his book Flowering Rifle. He amalgamated the names of the four Oxford “thirties poets” who were frequently, and unfairly, thought of as indistinguishable (anti-modernist in poetics, leftist in politics): Louis MacNeice (”Mac”), Stephen Spender (”sp”), W. H. Auden (”au-n”), and Cecil Day-Lewis (”day”).

MacNeicePoemsIt has become increasingly clear in recent decades that MacNeice, once consigned to the lower three-quarters of this composite caricature, has much more to offer than those who comprise the bottom half. Spender will likely be remembered largely on the strength of his mid-life memoir World Within World, though he proved peerless when posing in the role of dapper English poet, whether taking tea at an English lawn party or more potent tipples at lunch with Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis (in some quarters, his fabulous lifestyle earned him the derisive label “toady,” and, a real stinger, the “Rupert Brooke of the Depression”). Cecil Day-Lewis is still thought of as a charming but not terribly important poet, remembered for his honest and ironic reworking of Christopher Marlowe’s “The Passionate Shepherd to His Love” (which most readers will recognize by its first line, “Come, live with me and be my love”) and his translations of Virgil’s Georgics and Aeneid.

Faber Poets MacNeice is a separate case, and, while relegated to second place in the pantheon of English “thirties poets,” he is a much closer second than had earlier been imagined. In fact, it seems that if there is a chasm dividing the talents of his generation MacNeice stands on the same rim as Auden, waving to the remaining two across the way.

To read the rest of the introduction, click here.

CPR

Louis MacNeice: “His Own Unchanging Self”: An Interview with Jon Stallworthy

October 29th, 2007

StallworthySunil Iyengar interviews Jon Stallworthy on his biography of Louis MacNeice for the new MacNeice issue of the Contemporary Poetry Review:

Jon Stallworthy’s blood quickened after a poetry reading he gave earlier this year, not because he admired his own recitative powers, but because of something an audience member told him. This man, who turned out to be Stephen Spender’s nephew, had found a sheaf of letters in his late mother’s attic. His mother was Nancy Spender, Stephen’s sister-in-law, and it seems that she had maintained correspondence with her former lover, Louis MacNeice, long after their relationship had cooled. As MacNeice’s literary executor and official biographer, Stallworthy had known of the possible existence of some letters, but after the breakup of Nancy Spender’s first marriage, those had gone missing.

The letters her son found were different. They had been written between her two marriages, at the start of World War II. During this period, MacNeice was in America, chasing Eleanor Clark, a short-story writer to whom he wrote some of his most revealing correspondence, and getting reacquainted with his former wife Mary. The few dozen letters to Nancy Spender are “very entertaining and interesting about America,” Stallworthy says in a recent phone interview. They portray “his sense of what was happening at the outbreak of the war and how Americans were viewing the war,” he adds. “Even more so in the second half of the correspondence.” And what of Nancy’s letters to Louis? Her side of the exchange is missing only “because MacNeice kept nothing. Auden’s letters he would have put in the bin immediately. But the letters to her give you a very good sense of what she was saying to him, and they are very warm, humorous and thoroughly nice letters.”

To read the full interview, click here.

The E-Verse Nuptuals

October 25th, 2007

The long-awaited wedding between E-Verse’s very own Ernest Hilbert and and lovely Lynn occurred this past weekend on a gorgeous Philadelphia day with a lively crowd of participants. One of these participants, an E-Verse favorite Keith Kelleher, presented the following performance for the couple. There’s a few clips from the day sprinkled throughout. We’re promising more to come once the couple returns from their honeymoon in Greece. - Paul

Top Five “Good” Thieves

October 24th, 2007

reward


A long-time E-Verser ties a bandanna over her face and sends in Top Five “Good” Thieves (i.e., thieves who are revered as heroes, or anti-heroes, by lots of people):


5. The guys who pulled off the Great Train Robbery of 1963
4. Bonnie & Clyde
3. Butch & Sundance
2. Jesse James
1. Robin Hood

Bonus: Joey Coyle. Average Joe unemployed Philadelphian who happened to be walking along when an armored truck’s back doors opened and disgorged its contents. He grabbed 1.2 million dollars and ran. Apprehended a short time later and charged with theft, he was ultimately acquitted due to “temporary insanity.” This might be the only case ever in which someone was found not guilty of robbery due to temporary insanity–generally such pleas are reserved for murder trials.

Which leads us to . . . .

Robin HoodTop Five Qualities Anti-Hero Thieves Must Have to be Seen So in the Public Eyes:
1. He must be handsome.
2. He must be seen as nice to women and somehow romantic.
3. He should be perceived as someone who “sticks it to the man.”
4. He must be someone who consciously, chivalrously, attempts to minimize the harm he causes.
5. bravery or cleverness.

Bonus: Dying a tragic death helps but is not essential.

John Drexel’s “Classic Reading” of Louis MacNeice’s “Sunlight on the Garden”

October 18th, 2007

John Drexel offers us a “Classic Reading” of Louis MacNeice’s poem “Sunlight on the Garden” in the new issue of the Contemporary Poetry Review:

MacNeicetwoReviewing Stevie Smith’s Collected Poems in 1976, Seamus Heaney touched on “the whole question of poetry for the eye versus poetry for the ear.” One might be forgiven for momentarily thinking that the same question applies to the poetry of Louis MacNeice, which obviously is highly formal on paper but which gains much of its immediate appeal from its rhythms and the sound of its phrases. Indeed, according to George MacBeth, MacNeice “once said that if forced to choose between sound and sense he would have a slight preference for [sound].” However true this may be, I think it is safe to say that for MacNeice it ultimately is not a question of either/or. His is a poetry composed both for the eye and the ear; he is a poet whose eye for telling detail is allied to an ear attuned to the full resources of the English language and of English-language verse. Nowhere in MacNeice’s output is this more evident than in “The Sunlight in the Garden.”

MacNeice has long been viewed by some readers (though not the Irish) as an appendage to W. H. Auden. The fact that the two were contemporaries at Oxford in the 1920s and friends and collaborators in the 1930s may have made them seem representative of a certain literary sensibility related to their time and place, as has their appearance side by side in anthologies (with Auden inevitably given more weight).

Certainly MacNeice was always less political (and less religious) than Auden. At the same time, MacNeice wears his existential anxiety more openly on his sleeve than does Auden, who surveys his troubled landscapes from a great height, with a hawk’s eye. Even when MacNeice broods on the past or worries about the future, he is fully involved in the present moment, often obsessively so. It is a truism that Auden was concerned with goodness and truth, MacNeice with beauty. Perhaps the most useful thing that can be said about both poets in tandem is that they share a formal mastery. As Auden acknowledged in “The Cave of Making,” his tribute to MacNeice after the latter’s death in 1963, MacNeice was a “maker” who understood the “mystery” of the poet’s craft “from the inside.”

Read the rest of the piece here.

Next Page »
  • Feeds

      Subscribe in a reader

      Subscribe through iTunes

      Get E-Verse daily in your inbox:

    • E-Verse Video



Close
E-mail It